The next wave of government/media fear-mongering seems to be upon us as the Biden administration announces they are Stockpiling $290 Million Worth of Drugs for Radiation Sickness in Case of a Nuclear attack from Russia.
“As part of long-standing, ongoing efforts to be better prepared to save lives following radiological and nuclear emergencies, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is purchasing a supply of the drug Nplate from Amgen USA Inc; Nplate is approved to treat blood cell injuries that accompany acute radiation syndrome in adult and pediatric patients (ARS),” according to the news release.
“ARS, also known as radiation sickness, occurs when a person’s entire body is exposed to a high dose of penetrating radiation, reaching internal organs in a matter of seconds,” HHS said in the release. “Symptoms of ARS injuries include impaired blood clotting as a result of low platelet counts, which can lead to uncontrolled and life-threatening bleeding.”
Is the Biden Administration Pushing us into a Nuclear War?
Back in March of 2022, The United States Puppet, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelenskyy, looked like he was on the verge of face-to-face talks with Russia to stop the war. Unfortunately, it seems the Biden administration was more interested in continuing the proxy war with Russia and overthrowing Putin, and helped kill the peace talks.
Retired Col. Richard Black drafted an open letter to members of U.S. Congress on the horrors of nuclear Armageddon being pushed by the globalists in response to Russian actions in Ukraine.
“I am troubled by the loose talk about launching a nuclear attack on Russia. From time to time, senior Republicans and Democrats have suggested employing such weapons. This appears to be a deliberate effort to acclimate Americans to the idea of nuclear war,” Black wrote on the letter.
“Now, we have Zelensky’s office jumping on too. On September 21, 2022, Newsweek ran this headline: U.S. Needs to Threaten Russia With Nuclear Strike: Ukraine. The article quotes Mykhailo Podolyak, Zelensky’s senior aide, as saying, “The other nuclear states need to say very firmly that as soon as Russia even thinks of carrying out nuclear strikes on foreign territory – in this case, the territory of Ukraine – there will be swift retaliatory nuclear strikes to destroy the nuclear launch sites in Russia.
“Of course, it is impossible to limit retaliatory nuclear strikes to destroying only the nuclear launch sites. Not only would the damage be widespread, but Russia would be forced to respond in kind to threats targeting its nuclear deterrence capability. Russia would launch an immediate, massive nuclear response, including air and ground-based hypersonic missiles and submarine-launched ballistic missiles.
“As the Ukrainian War drags on, globalists are marching us relentlessly toward this nuclear Armageddon. Why?”
Are Globalists actually hoping for a Nuclear Way in some Sick and Twisted Global Warming Experiment?
While this may seem like a bizarre conspiracy theory, back in 2011 the same psychotic tyrants who promoted the COVID vaccination scam were trying to promote the idea that a small nuclear war could reverse global warming.
In 2011, NASA and other factions of the U.S. government began modeling the effects of a war involving a hundred Hiroshima-level bombs, or 0.03 percent of the world’s current nuclear arsenal, according to National Geographic. According to NASA climate models, the result could actually be global cooling.
The global cooling caused by these high carbon clouds wouldn’t be as catastrophic as a superpower-versus-superpower nuclear winter, but “the effects would still be regarded as leading to unprecedented climate change,” research physical scientist Luke Oman said during a press briefing at a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington, D.C.
National Geographic, in an article that has since been removed from the internet but can still be viewed via the web archive project, gleefully reported at the time that “After a regional nuclear war, though, average global temperatures would drop by 2.25 degrees F (1.25 degrees C) for two to three years afterward, the models suggest.”
At the extreme, the tropics, Europe, Asia, and Alaska would cool by 5.4 to 7.2 degrees F (3 to 4 degrees C), according to the models. Parts of the Arctic and Antarctic would actually warm a bit, due to shifted wind and ocean-circulation patterns, the researchers said.
After ten years, average global temperatures would still be 0.9 degree F (0.5 degree C) lower than before the nuclear war, the models predict.
Where would Russia Attack?
In December 2018, Russian President Vladimir Putin warned the world that we were all facing an increasing threat of nuclear war and warned that the danger should not be discounted. At a news conference, Putin warned that “it could lead to the destruction of civilization as a whole and maybe even our planet.”
Back in 2019, Russian State T.V. broadcasted a list of U.S. military facilities that Moscow would target in the event of a nuclear strike and is claimed a hyper-sonic missile they were developing could hit anywhere in the United States in less than five minutes. The potential targets include the Pentagon, Fort Richie, Jim Creek, McClellan, and the presidential retreat in Camp David, Maryland.
U.S. quietly preparing for Nuclear Attack for years
After being largely abandoned by the Pentagon, the infamous doomsday bunker, The Cheyenne Mountain Complex, was mysteriously reopened in 2015. According to Peter Pry, executive director of the EMP Task Force, a bipartisan congressional commission, the contract to reopen The Cheyenne Mountain Complex was issued to protect sensitive military electronics from a potential EMP attack.
“What it could do, these various threats, is black out the U.S. electric grid for a protracted period of months or years,” warned Pry, “Nine out of ten Americans could die from starvation, disease, and societal collapse if the blackout lasted a year.”
In December 2018, The Department of Homeland Security took the unprecedented step of warning the public that the electric grid was a “prime target” and warned that Americans needed to be prepared for up to six months without electricity, transportation, fuel, money, and healthcare.
At the same time, the CDC held a briefing titled “Public Health Response to a Nuclear Detonation” was meant to prepare the American public for the possibility of a nuclear strike on America soil.
Surviving a Nuclear Blast
While the thought of a nuclear attack is undoubtedly terrifying, as long as you are not at ground zero, you have a pretty good chance of surviving if you take the right steps. If it’s a lone single blast, those outside the epicenter have a pretty good chance of survival. I advise heading over to our main article on surviving a nuclear explosion and then making sure you and your family are prepared to survive a long-term crisis.